<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trend Setting Design &#187; new pepsi logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/tag/new-pepsi-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trendsettingdesign.com</link>
	<description>Graphic Designer &#38; Website Design in Greensboro, NC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:28:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Pepsi Logo and Identity</title>
		<link>http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/2009/01/new-pepsi-logo-and-identity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/2009/01/new-pepsi-logo-and-identity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Cotten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logo design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new pepsi logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pepsi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trendsettingonline.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve probably noticed at your local grocery store or gas station that Pepsico has come out with a new corporate identity.  It&#8217;s clearly an attempt at an evolutionary (vs. revolutionary) change, with a similar color palette and predominantly blue background on the flagship product, Pepsi.  I think it&#8217;s a bad identity.  Find out why after [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="295" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kKiIpvPeB80&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="295" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kKiIpvPeB80&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>You&#8217;ve probably noticed at your local grocery store or gas station that Pepsico has come out with a new corporate identity.  It&#8217;s clearly an attempt at an evolutionary (vs. revolutionary) change, with a similar color palette and predominantly blue background on the flagship product, Pepsi.  I think it&#8217;s a bad identity.  Find out why after the jump.<span id="more-139"></span></p>
<p>A logo refresh, and certainly a new corporate identity should push a company forward into it&#8217;s growing vision.  Branding should reflect where a company will be in ten years, and if properly done, will propel the company into that vision.  It should never be done to fit in better with &#8220;the crowd&#8221; or to better adhere to a current design trend.  Here&#8217;s the first thing that pops into most people&#8217;s minds when they view these:</p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_141" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 473px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img class="size-full wp-image-141" title="Pepsi logos" src="https://seoul.rochen.com/~trendset/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/pepsiredesignbh2.jpg" alt="pepsi logos" width="463" height="306" /></dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p>&#8220;So Pepsi voted for Obama?&#8221;  At which point the Pepsi executives would say, &#8220;No, that&#8217;s not the Obama logo &#8211; it&#8217;s a stylized smiley face!  Isn&#8217;t that fun?&#8221;  Well, it sure doesn&#8217;t look like a smile to me, and I&#8217;m all about symbolism and implied meanings.  It looks like a bad print job of the old Pepsi logo.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot that&#8217;s bad about this, from the nauseating &#8220;e&#8221; in &#8220;pepsi&#8221;, to the clinical, cold layout, to the fact that it looks like the packaging for an mp3 player more than a food product.  <strong>Plus</strong>, the logo changes depending on the drink!  Come on, guys!  That aspect seems to have been an afterthought, since with the pepsi max can, the logo has a much larger &#8220;grin&#8221;, depicting the higher caffeine amount in the drink, but the rest of the pepsi max can is bland, boring, grey, clinical and sterile.  If you&#8217;re going to change the logo to depict a more exciting customer experience, you have to follow through with the entire package &#8211; which they have <strong>not </strong>done.</p>
<p>This new look seeks to set itself apart from the competition, which it does indeed.  I&#8217;ll give them that: they stick out like a sore thumb, or like a medical appliance in the frozen foods section.</p>
<p>Feel free to comment, especially if you disagree with me.  I know there are mixed opinions on this out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/2009/01/new-pepsi-logo-and-identity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

