<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trend Setting Design &#187; realign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/tag/realign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trendsettingdesign.com</link>
	<description>Graphic Designer &#38; Website Design in Greensboro, NC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:28:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>KCC Realign</title>
		<link>http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/2009/12/kcc-realign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/2009/12/kcc-realign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Cotten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding & Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/?p=530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I created the corporate identity for Kernersville Community Church (KCC) in 2007 to reflect the infancy of a new vision, coming from new leadership in the church. KCC was originally planted over a decade ago, but a new, younger pastor with a new vision came to the church 3 years ago. The original identity was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I created the corporate identity for Kernersville Community Church (KCC) in 2007 to reflect the infancy of a new vision, coming from new leadership in the church.  KCC was originally planted over a decade ago, but a new, younger pastor with a new vision came to the church 3 years ago.  The original identity was never correctly implemented, and the church desperately needed a cohesive brand to unite under.  I designed the 2007 identity to reflect the vision of the church: outward focused, warm and friendly atmosphere.<span id="more-530"></span>You can see the <a title="Kernersville Community Church old brand" href="http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/2008/12/kernersville-community-church-identity/">2007 KCC identity here</a>.  I used vintage tones and lots of gradients to impart a warmth to the look, while also paying visual homage to history and age.  KCC has been around a while, and the identity needed to reflect that, while also making a clear shift to outward thinking, using the cityscape and houses to communicate that.</p>
<p>Over the course of two years, the vision has been further refined, and because KCC is essentially a &#8220;replant&#8221; of a church, the &#8220;culture&#8221; of the church has changed drastically over two years.  I helped redesign the interior of the church, bringing in modern colors and lighting to the space, and the church is now doing lots of outreach.  In addition, the style of the meetings has changed to a cutting edge experience.  It became clear to me that my 2007 identity had quickly become outdated.  Normally a brand/identity will last much longer than two years, but in special cases, an identity can become outdated if the vision, mission, values or corporate culture of the organization change in large measure.  In KCC&#8217;s case, the corporate culture changed enough to cause a disconnect with the identity.  What KCC needed was not a redesign; rather a realign was the best option because the core vision and values had not changed; just the atmosphere of the church.</p>
<p>I kept the basic premise of the brand intact, but updated the typography, adjusted the color scheme and proportions to show a more cutting-edge, modern aesthetic, along with more aggression.  KCC is a church with a lot of forward motion, so the new identity had to reflect that.</p>
<p>The logotype was originally Myriad Pro with Garamond Premier Pro as the subtitle.  They had been chosen for a clean-but-creative look.  For the realigned identity, I chose Bree Extra Bold Oblique for the title and Zapatista for the subtitle.  Bree is a typeface with a pleasing upright-italic feel that exhibits lots of creative flair—KCC has lots of artists and a public art gallery in its building—and Zapatista is an aggressive grungy typewriter font.  I proportioned everything inside the Golden Ratio (a.k.a. Divine Ratio) to show a sense of order amid all the gutteral grunge treatments.  I also removed the vintage surround of the identity to demonstrate the shift from history to future.</p>
<div id="attachment_531" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 693px"><img class="size-large wp-image-531 " title="KCC Old and New" src="http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/NewLogoIdea-854x1023.jpg" alt="My 2007 (top) and 2009 (bottom) logos" width="683" height="818" /><p class="wp-caption-text">My 2007 (top) and 2009 (bottom) logos</p></div>
<p>The realigned identity is being implemented slowly, as needs arise.  This is done to keep costs down for this [essentially] young church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/2009/12/kcc-realign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redesign vs Realign</title>
		<link>http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/2009/02/redesign-vs-realign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/2009/02/redesign-vs-realign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Cotten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trendsettingonline.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most crucial questions to ask when designing a new corporate identity or any of it&#8217;s constituent parts is, &#8220;What of the old identity still works?  What needs to stay, and what needs to go?&#8221; Often, a company already has a strong brand presence or a large customer base, and therefore needs to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most crucial questions to ask when designing a new corporate identity or any of it&#8217;s constituent parts is, <strong>&#8220;What of the old identity still works?  What needs to stay, and what needs to go?&#8221;</strong> Often, a company already has a strong brand presence or a large customer base, and therefore needs to remain recognizable.  Other times, as demonstrated in the article below, a client may have a good web presence, and simply needs to &#8220;realign&#8221; their site to better meet their customers&#8217; needs.  The question at this point becomes one of &#8220;Do I redesign their site, or do I realign it?&#8221;<span id="more-178"></span> The difference between those two terms is actually quite large.  A redesign could be compared to starting with a clean slate, while a realignment is like taking an outline, and erasing the sub-headings, but keeping the main points unchanged.  Many designers automatically jump to a redesign because it puts the designer in complete control, whereas a realignment takes more work and thought to get a company&#8217;s identity to morph into a more effective one.</p>
<p>Take, for instance the United Parcel Service (UPS) logo:</p>
<div id="attachment_181" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 360px"><img class="size-full wp-image-181" title="UPS Logos" src="https://seoul.rochen.com/~trendset/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ups-logo.jpg" alt="UPS Logo - Old and New" width="350" height="194" /><p class="wp-caption-text">UPS Logo - Old and New</p></div>
<p>The old logo, designed by Paul Rand was actually amazing.  It&#8217;s actually quite a bit stronger than the new logo, but the change to the new logo was the right move to make.  UPS successfully grew it&#8217;s &#8220;UPS&#8221; brand to be a globally recognized force.  It&#8217;s rare to hear someone call the company &#8220;United Parcel Service&#8221;; rather, everyone instantly equates &#8220;UPS&#8221; to package delivery.  The old logo was a big part of making that happen, with the symbolism of a package at the top and a shield on the bottom, combining the ideas of parcel, strength and safety.  As the company came into the new century, their customer base had grown younger, more modern, and more demanding.  In addition, UPS no longer had to &#8220;spell out&#8221; the parcel nature of the business.  Therefore, the shift away from depicting a package, and more toward a modern interpretation of a shield was an excellent choice.  The new logo is a perfect example of a design realign &#8211; it kept the &#8220;soul&#8221; of the original identity, but got rid of extraneous elements.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to the article that got me thinking about this:</p>
<p>http://www.alistapart.com/articles/redesignrealign</p>
<p>My one disagreement with the List Apart article is that I think there are more times where a redesign is necessary than Mr. Moll gives credit for.  There are internal company issues that can be helped by a redesign.  Often a company can become mired in sundry ruts, from the way employees view the company, to the way customer support treats their employess, and often a corporate identity redesign can help everyone in the company to get jolted out of those ruts.  Therefore, often times a redesign benefits the company in ways other than attracting new clientele or better serving the current customer base.</p>
<p>However, it remains a good question to ask, and a good reminder to all of us designers &#8211; don&#8217;t jump the gun to a full redesign!  It will require more planning and work, but it could be that a realignment will better serve your clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trendsettingdesign.com/2009/02/redesign-vs-realign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

